The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian
What’s not to love about slideshows?
Well, probably a few things—bad vacation photographs and the long-winded stories that usually accompany them, to name a few. However, since we have a huge pool of photos available to us as raw material, we are finding them more delightful, especially when they include the Smithsonian collections and prompt us to look at the photography collections in a new light.
Flickr has a not-so-new feature called Galleries which lets people group images across Flickr in ways that make sense to them. As a member of the Commons, we thoroughly enjoy ego-surfing these galleries.
Some are just fun to look at, like Beards across the Commons and Hats across the Commons . Some are seasonal, like Snow in the Archives - Brrrr! Some clearly are made to inspire future projects, like stories II and aquarium. Some may be for school projects, like Inventors and American Foodways. Some are revealing, like How Flickr Distracts Me from Real Work.
When I saw Flickr user, Adreinne Waheed, assembling gorgeous groups of photos related to African and African-American History, I wanted to know more. It turns out Adreinne is a photographer, editor, and researcher, spending the last decade photo editing at magazines. She also used to be local to Washington, D.C., an alumnus of Howard University. She spends time on the Commons looking for photos to research future projects.
We hope to learn more about how Adreinne uses the Commons and want to hear from you about how you use Smithsonian’s photo collections. In the meantime, enjoy the show!
Comments (7) – Leave a comment
i,m not impressed at these images just a slapped up bunch of untreated uncropped photos , these historical images should be cleaned and color adjusted ,
Hi Dave, The Smithsonian participates in the Flickr Commons in order to create greater access to the institution's vast collections of photographs. While I can't speak for the other museums and archives represented here, our posted files are faithful renditions of the originals---uncropped and un-enhanced--- because we choose to preserve the fact of their authenticity as a part of their history. Best, Effie
Thanks, Effie. "Correcting" an historical document, of any kind, of its perceived imperfections robs it of its authenticity and, therefore, its inherent value as an archive/artifact. Although technology can make photos and documents "more appealing," choosing not to do this and publishing them digitally (warts and all) to a wider audience, broadens access and preserves them physically. Who knows what may be present in these images that "perfection" would obliterate? Thankfully these images, unlike so many "slapped up" on the web, have good captions (just hold your cursor over the image) and tell where the originals are located.
i'm not sure what else needs to be said to dave, but i must add my absolute disagreement with him. i thought the selection of images was good and i agree with the others that they should not have been 'enhanced' in any way. i also thought that it was a plus that there was no overt attempt to politicize the images. they do tell their own story and i must suspect that it is one that dave didnt live thru, doesnt understand and would argue with if he thought he could.
Thank you all for your comments. It's obviously an issue that we're all grappling as technology makes it easier to hide 'flaws.' We often see offers on Flickr to help us enhance the photos we post there, and while we appreciate their willingness to volunteer their services, we don't take them up on it since we want to stay as close to the original as possible. If you want to read more, another resident blogger, Catherine Shteynberg, wrote about an image an online volunteer retouched on Flickr. The image is from the National Archive in The Hague and I, for one, was glad that I saw the original - /2009/10/16/retouching-reality/
There are two extremes to allowing these online photo communities. One side is not allowing anybody or anything to post, such as many blogs that only publish comments they find "worthy". Then there are Flikr, photobucket, etc...who allow anything to upload and share. There has to be a middle ground.
Leave a comment
Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.
About
Smithsonian on Flickr Commons
Topics/Tags
- See Here (611)
- American History (542)
- Science (429)
- Archive (329)
- Cities/Places (277)
- Exhibitions (234)
- Web/Tech (210)
- Photo History (189)
- Link Love (153)
- Politics/Government (153)
Blog Roll
Categories
- Collections in Focus (988)
- What Gets Saved (337)
- Behind the Scenes (212)
- Smithsonian History (134)
Monthly Archive
- May 2013 (20)
- April 2013 (26)
- March 2013 (26)
- February 2013 (26)
- January 2013 (28)
- December 2012 (26)
- November 2012 (28)
- October 2012 (32)
- September 2012 (26)
- August 2012 (31)
- July 2012 (26)
- June 2012 (27)
- May 2012 (27)
- April 2012 (27)
- March 2012 (28)
- February 2012 (27)
- January 2012 (26)
- December 2011 (31)
- November 2011 (28)
- October 2011 (35)
- September 2011 (31)
- August 2011 (35)
- July 2011 (41)
- June 2011 (43)
- May 2011 (33)
- April 2011 (40)
- March 2011 (43)
- February 2011 (35)
- January 2011 (36)
- December 2010 (42)
- November 2010 (40)
- October 2010 (44)
- September 2010 (37)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (38)
- June 2010 (37)
- May 2010 (42)
- April 2010 (44)
- March 2010 (47)
- February 2010 (40)
- January 2010 (39)
- December 2009 (43)
- November 2009 (34)
- October 2009 (11)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (1)

